Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 87-90, June 2010

Flexor digitorum longus tendon exposure for flatfoot reconstruction: A comparison of two methods in a cadaveric model

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK

Received 14 April 2009; received in revised form 6 June 2009; accepted 11 June 2009. published online 19 August 2009.

Abstract 

Background

A novel method for harvesting the flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon has been described via a plantar approach based on a surface coordinate. The aim of this investigation is to provide a comparison with the traditional medial midfoot dissection for tendon harvest.

Methods

The FDL tendon was exposed in 10 cadaveric feet via a limited plantar approach and also medially as far as could be accessed via the knot of Henry. The FDL was marked with a metal clip in each approach. The lengths of the skin incisions were recorded and the distance between the two markers was measured.

Results

The mean additional length of tendon accessed via the plantar approach was 22.9mm with a mean reduction in skin incision length of 15.6mm.

Conclusion

Using the plantar exposure, a longer length of tendon can be obtained through a smaller skin incision which has been quantified here.

Keywords: Flexor digitorum longus, Tendon, Flatfoot, Cadaver

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1268-7731(09)00074-5

doi:10.1016/j.fas.2009.06.003

Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 87-90, June 2010