Is intraoperative pedography helpful in clinical use—Preliminary results of 100 cases from a consecutive, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical use, and to analyze the potential clinical benefit of intraoperative pedography (IP) in a sufficient number of cases in comparison with cases treated without IP.
Methods
Patients (age 18 years and older) which sustained an arthrodesis and/or correction of the foot and ankle were included.
Results
One hundred cases were included (ankle correction arthrodesis, n
=
12; subtalar joint correction arthrodesis, n
=
14; arthrodesis without correction midfoot, n
=
15; correction arthrodesis midfoot, n
=
26; correction forefoot, n
=
33). Fifty-two patients were randomized for the use of IP. In 24 of the 52 patients (46%), the correction was modified after IP during the same operation.
Conclusions
In 46% of the cases a modification of the surgical correction was made after IP in the same surgical procedure. Whether IP improve the plantar force distribution of the foot and the mid- or long-term clinical outcome has to be critically analyzed when longer follow-up is completed.
Keywords: Pedography, Intraoperative Pedography (IP), Correction, Arthrodesis, Plantar force distribution
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S1268-7731(09)00032-0
doi:10.1016/j.fas.2009.03.002
© 2009 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
