Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 3 , Pages 161-165, 2008

Healing of ungrafted bone defects of the talus after benign tumour removal

  • E. Shears

      Affiliations

    • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 0 121 627 1627.
  • ,
  • K. Dehne

      Affiliations

    • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • H. Murata

      Affiliations

    • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, United Kingdom
    • Department of Orthopaedics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
  • ,
  • A. Abudu

      Affiliations

    • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • R.J. Grimer

      Affiliations

    • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • R.M. Tillman

      Affiliations

    • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • S.R. Carter

      Affiliations

    • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, United Kingdom

Received 30 July 2007; received in revised form 22 January 2008; accepted 25 January 2008. published online 28 March 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Curettage of benign tumours commonly results in significant bone defects that are reconstructed with autologous grafts, allografts, bone cement or bone substitute. We have treated such defects in the talus without reconstruction with bone or any other material. We now report the healing of these ungrafted defects in eight patients treated with curettage for benign talar tumours.

Methods

Eight consecutive patients were reviewed retrospectively at a mean follow-up of 82 months (range: 28-180 months). Mean age was 21.7 years (range: 12.3-31.3 years) and mean defect size was 16.5cm3 (range: 3.5-48cm3). Outcome measures included time to radiological consolidation, ankle pain and stiffness, talar collapse, and tibiotalar joint osteoarthritis.

Results

Full consolidation of the defect occurred within 6-12 months in all patients. One patient had minor discomfort over the scar, but there was no ankle joint pain. Two patients had some ankle stiffness, although one had established ankle osteoarthritis prior to surgery. No talar collapse, fracture or new significant osteoarthritis of the ankle was observed.

Conclusions

We conclude that bone grafting is not a necessary adjunct to the curettage of talar lesions.

Keywords: Talus, Curettage, Bone defect, Ungrafted, Bone graft

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1268-7731(08)00021-0

doi:10.1016/j.fas.2008.01.006

Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume 14, Issue 3 , Pages 161-165, 2008