A new foot and ankle outcome score: Questionnaire based, subjective, Visual-Analogue-Scale, validated and computerized
Abstract
Our purpose was to construct and validate a new score taking into consideration the flaws of existing scores.
Methods
A new score named Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) with the following features was constructed: questionnaire based on 20 subjective questions, Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS) based rating, computerized evaluation. The score was validated in 121 subjects. For validation, SF-36® and Hannover Questionnaire (Q) were obtained and correlated with VAS FA.
Results
The correlation VAS FA versus SF-36® and Q (Pearson, all p-values <0.001, r
≥
0.5) was sufficient for the total score and all score categories (pain, function, other complaints).
The time needed for evaluating the scores was significantly lower for VAS FA than for SF-36® and Q (Oneway-ANOVA, p
<
0.001).
Conclusions
The introduced score is the first validated (on SF-36®), subjective, VAS based outcome score for foot and ankle. The VAS FA is computerized which enables faster evaluation than SF-36® or Q.
Keywords: Score, Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS), Validation, Foot and ankle surgery
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S1268-7731(06)00037-3
doi:10.1016/j.fas.2006.04.001
© 2006 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
